<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Yellow Roadway can make you serious green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/</link>
	<description>One person's attempt to Beat the Street</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: loslobos71</title>
		<link>http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>loslobos71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree that this stock isnt on the watchlist of many hedge funds/ investment banks. But I think that when they realize that this company is actually a great performer it will be more heavily traded, and probably go up. For exmaple, there are only 13 analysts that cover this company ($10 billion revenue) but 19 who cover CH Robinson (CHRW) which only has $6.5 billion in revenue. To contrast both of these, Electronic Arts (ERTS) has $3.1 billion in revenue (30% of YRCW&#039;S) but 32 anaylsts-almost triple!

In any case, they just reported a great quarter, despite the weakening economy, and issued a good outlook for 2007. They said that theyll earn between $4.7 - $4.9 per share in 2007, which puts them at 9.2- 9.5x earnings--still cheap! 

With regards to bad volume being bad, I don&#039;t think that thats neccesarily true. VF Corporation, for example, has a $9 billion market cap and trades 650,000 shares per day. But look how well its done- http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=VFC&amp;t=my

Thanks for reading! 
The Stock Geek, Stu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree that this stock isnt on the watchlist of many hedge funds/ investment banks. But I think that when they realize that this company is actually a great performer it will be more heavily traded, and probably go up. For exmaple, there are only 13 analysts that cover this company ($10 billion revenue) but 19 who cover CH Robinson (CHRW) which only has $6.5 billion in revenue. To contrast both of these, Electronic Arts (ERTS) has $3.1 billion in revenue (30% of YRCW&#8217;S) but 32 anaylsts-almost triple!</p>
<p>In any case, they just reported a great quarter, despite the weakening economy, and issued a good outlook for 2007. They said that theyll earn between $4.7 &#8211; $4.9 per share in 2007, which puts them at 9.2- 9.5x earnings&#8211;still cheap! </p>
<p>With regards to bad volume being bad, I don&#8217;t think that thats neccesarily true. VF Corporation, for example, has a $9 billion market cap and trades 650,000 shares per day. But look how well its done- <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=VFC&amp;t=my" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=VFC&amp;t=my</a></p>
<p>Thanks for reading!<br />
The Stock Geek, Stu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YELL-O-BRICK- ROAD</title>
		<link>http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>YELL-O-BRICK- ROAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestockgeek.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/why-yellow-roadway-can-make-you-serious-green/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I had purchased YRCW at $22, when its symbol was YELL(I loved this symbol)........
I hung on to it for 3 years, and finally just sold it at about $40....I always felt it should
have gone up a lot further because compared to its peers it was &quot;a True Value Stock&quot;
1. I was mad when they changed the symbol...many people &quot;lost it&quot; when it changed...
and therefore the volumes were way way down.......so no one really &quot;knows&quot; about the company. 2. I didn&#039;t feel the company was doing enough to get &quot;its name out there&quot; to the institutional investors, who are the ones that,&quot; makes the markets move&quot;...volume continued to be in the very low volume area, for such a large capitalized company....
so I sold, because they just said that &quot;sales are down because of the downturn in the economy&quot; even tho I am sure this was built into the price because the price didn;t really move at all (down) in fact it has trended upward now.....go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had purchased YRCW at $22, when its symbol was YELL(I loved this symbol)&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
I hung on to it for 3 years, and finally just sold it at about $40&#8230;.I always felt it should<br />
have gone up a lot further because compared to its peers it was &#8220;a True Value Stock&#8221;<br />
1. I was mad when they changed the symbol&#8230;many people &#8220;lost it&#8221; when it changed&#8230;<br />
and therefore the volumes were way way down&#8230;&#8230;.so no one really &#8220;knows&#8221; about the company. 2. I didn&#8217;t feel the company was doing enough to get &#8220;its name out there&#8221; to the institutional investors, who are the ones that,&#8221; makes the markets move&#8221;&#8230;volume continued to be in the very low volume area, for such a large capitalized company&#8230;.<br />
so I sold, because they just said that &#8220;sales are down because of the downturn in the economy&#8221; even tho I am sure this was built into the price because the price didn;t really move at all (down) in fact it has trended upward now&#8230;..go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
